Total 4731 registered members
Current Switching with High Voltage Air Disconnector

Current Switching with High Voltage Air Disconnector

In the paper are presented results of switching overvoltages investigations, produced by operations of air disconnector rated voltage 220 kV. Measurements of these switching overvoltages are performed in the air-insulated substation HPP Grabovica on River Neretva, which is an important object for operation of electric power system of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Investigations of operating of air disconnector type Centre-Break were performed in order to determine switching overvoltage levels that can lead to relay tripping in HPP Grabovica. During operations of disconnector (synchronization or disconnecting of generator from network) malfunctions of signalling devices and burning of supply units of protection relays were appeared. Also, results of computer simulations using EMTP-ATP [1] are presented.

I. INTRODUCTION

Switching operation in power stations and substations, highvoltage faults and lightning cause high levels of high frequency overvoltages that can be coupled with low voltage secondary circuits and electronic equipment unless they are suitably protected. The function of high-voltage air-break disconnectors is to provide electrical isolation of one part of the switchgear.

Disconnector’s standards define a negligible current interrupting capability (≤0.5 A) or a voltage between the contacts if it is not significantly changed. These values of currents include the capacitive charging currents of bushing, bus bars, connectors, very short lengths of cables and the current of voltage instrument transformers. Disconnector’s contacts in air-insulated substations (AIS) are moving slowly causing numerous strikes and restrikes between contacts.

When the contacts are closed, the capacitive charging current flowing through the contacts ranges from 0.017×10-3 to 1.1×10-3 A/m for voltage levels 72.5 – 500 kV [2], depending on the rated voltage and length of bus, which is switched.

Strikes and restrikes occur as soon as the dielectric strength of the air between contacts is exceeded by overvoltage. The distance between contacts, the contacts geometry and relative atmospheric condition defines the overvoltage at the instant of strike. Every strike causes high-frequency currents tending to equalize potentials at the contacts. When the current is interrupted, the voltages at the source side and the loading side will oscillate independently. The source side will follow the power frequency while the loading side will remain at the trapped voltage. As soon as the voltage between contacts exceeds the dielectric strength of the air, at that distance the restrike will occur, and so on. Successive strikes occurring during the closing and opening operations of the off-loaded bus by the disconnector are shown in Fig. 1 a and b, respectively.

When closing takes place, the first strike will occur at the maximum value of the source voltage. Its values can be positive or negative. As the time passes a series of successive strikes will keep occurring at reduced amplitude, until the contacts touch. The highest transient overvoltage therefore occurs during the initial pre-arc, Fig.1 a. When the disconnector opening, restrikes occur because of the very small initial clearance between the contacts. At the transient beginning, the intervals between particular strikes are on the order of a millisecond, while just before the last strike; the period can reach about one half of cycle at power frequency, Fig. 1 b.

Fig. 1. The voltage due to the disconnector switching a)	Disconnector closing, b)	Disconnector opening 1-source side voltage, 2- load side voltage

Fig. 1. The voltage due to the disconnector switching a) Disconnector closing, b) Disconnector opening 1-source side voltage, 2- load side voltage

During the switching time of operations of disconnectors at HPP Grabovica up to 500 restrikes were registered. In paper [3] there are up to 5000 restrike registered during switching operation of the disconnector. The maximum value of voltages and maximum value of the wave front increasing will take place at the maximum distance between contacts. For the purpose of the investigation of the insulation strength and induction of electromagnetic interferences (EMI), the most important are the first few strikes during the closing operation or the last few strikes during the opening operation. Each individual strike causes a travelling wave with the basic frequency on the order 0.5 MHz (330 kHz-600 kHz). Very fast transient overvoltage due to the closing operation of the disconnector at the load side of the test circuit is shown in Fig.2.

Fig. 2. Very fast transient overvoltage due to the closing operation Channel 1- source side voltage Channel 2-load side voltage

Fig. 2. Very fast transient overvoltage due to the closing operation Channel 1- source side voltage Channel 2-load side voltage

These high-frequency phenomena are coupled with the secondary circuits as a result of various mechanisms. The strongest interference is exerted by the stray capacities between the high-voltage conductors and the grounding system, followed by the metallic link between the grounding system and the secondary circuits.

High-frequency transient current flowing in the grounding system generates potential differences, every time when a strike occurs between disconnector’s contacts. In large secondary circuits, the potential differences are in the form of longitudinal voltages between the equipment inputs and the equipment enclosures.

Depending on the type of secondary circuits used and the way they are laid, differential voltages may also occur. Such a coupling mechanism has a special effect on the secondary circuits of instrument transformers, and particularly on the connected instruments, since these circuits are always galvanically linked to the grounding system. Another factor, which cannot be discounted, is the linking of these circuits to the primary plant via the internal capacities of the instrument transformers [4].

Interference levels in secondary circuits of air-insulated substations during switching disconnectors depend on following parameters:

  • The transient voltages and currents generated by the switching operation;
  • The voltage level of the substation;
  • The relative position of the source of disturbances and susceptor;
  • The nature of the grounding network;
  • The cable type (shielded or unshielded);
  • The way the shields are grounded.

There are two main modes of coupling secondary circuits with primary circuits [3, 5]:

  1. Electromagnetic or EM coupling, which can be split into three sub-categories; inductive, capacitive and radiative. The most important source of EM coupling is the propagating current and voltage waves on bus bars and power lines during high-voltage switching operations by disconnectors;
  2. Common impedance coupling, as a result of coupling caused by the sharing of a lumped impedance common to both the source and susceptor circuits.

Common mode voltages, i.e., voltages measured between conductors and local ground, represent the main parameter used for assessing equipment immunity. The difficulty of comparing data comes from the fact that different authors performed measurements at different places (some measurements were made at the closest point to the disconnector being operated whereas others made measurements in the vicinity of the auxiliary equipment, i.e. in the relay room). Little information is available about the grounding practice of the neutral conductor in CT or VT circuits, the quality and grounding of the sable shields as well as how the measurements have been performed. Therefore, the measured levels have to be analyzed very carefully before comparison and drawing any conclusions [5]. Results of up to date measured common mode voltages at secondary circuits of CVT, CT and VT are presented in the paper [5]. There are maximum levels of the common mode voltages ranging from 100 Vpeak up to 2.5 kVpeak in the shields of the secondary circuits cables of the CT and VT. Results show that measured values of the common mode voltages at CT/CV secondary circuits, 220 kV ratings, range from Ucm=0.32 kVpeak [6] up to Ucm=0.85 kVpeak [7].

Results shown in paper [3] are for measured common mode voltages from 3-4 kV during switching operation by disconnector in 150 kV switchgear up to 6-10 kV at 400 kV switchgear.

II. RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS ON SITE

The last ten years of extensive analysis of disconnector and circuit breakers generated EMI measurements that have confirmed that disconnector operation with off-loaded busbar is the most important and typical source of interference in secondary circuits of substations. Measurements of switching overvoltages generated during disconnector operation in the air insulated substation HPP Grabovica on the river Neretva were performed. HPP Grabovica is an important object for operating of electric power system of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Investigations of operating of air disconnector type Centre-Break were performed in order to determine switching overvoltage levels that can lead to relay tripping in HPP Grabovica [8].

During operations of disconnector (synchronization or disconnecting of generator from network) malfunctions of signalling devices and burning of supply units of protection relays were appeared. Malfunctioning of auxiliary circuits were manifested by tripping relay of differential protection of the generator, phase ’4′- signalization on relay box ‘ZB I‘ and signalling ‘fire’ in 35 kV control panel.

At the same time sparking between primary terminals of the current transformer (CT) was occurred. Malfunctioning of
signalling circuits were lower (not eliminated) with installing shielded cables. Also, independent of switching operation of air insulated disconnectors, during synchronization of generator AG1 on network, it’s happened that one of the pole of 220 kV circuit breaker failures. In this case generator AG1 worked in motor regime. Because of that, HPP Grabovica plans to install circuit breakers on generator’s voltage (10,5 kV) [9].

The field tests were performed at the test circuit at HPP Grabovica, Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. The considered test circuit VT-voltage transformer (220/√3/0.1/√3/0.1/√3 kV), CT-current transformer (200/1/1 A), CVD-capacitive voltage divider, CB-circuit breaker with two interrupting chambers and parallel capacitors (SF6 220 kV, 1600 A), Dc- disconnector (220 kV, 1250 A), MOSA-metal oxide surge arrester (Ur=199,5 kV, 10 kA), PT-power transformer (64 MVA, 242/10,5±5% kV, YD5), AG1- generator 1 (64 MVA, 10,5±5% kV)

Fig. 3. The considered test circuit VT-voltage transformer (220/√3/0.1/√3/0.1/√3 kV), CT-current transformer (200/1/1 A), CVD-capacitive voltage divider, CB-circuit breaker with two interrupting chambers and parallel capacitors (SF6 220 kV, 1600 A), Dc- disconnector (220 kV, 1250 A), MOSA-metal oxide surge arrester (Ur=199,5 kV, 10 kA), PT-power transformer (64 MVA, 242/10,5±5% kV, YD5), AG1- generator 1 (64 MVA, 10,5±5% kV)

The recorded wave shape of the overvoltage at the load side is shown in Fig. 4. The overvoltage factors at busbar, k, were recorded up to 1.16 p.u. with the dominant frequency of considered transient fd equal to 0.536 MHz. Common mode voltages, Ucm, at VT were up to 708 Vpeak, with dominant frequency equal to 1.31 MHz.

Fig. 4. Waveshape of the overvoltage Channel 1-voltage at CVD; ch 1 (2.5 V/div), probe 1x100, ratio 455 Channel 2-voltages at secondary of VT; ch 2 (5 V/div), probe 1x100

Fig. 4. Waveshape of the overvoltage Channel 1-voltage at CVD; ch 1 (2.5 V/div), probe 1x100, ratio 455 Channel 2-voltages at secondary of VT; ch 2 (5 V/div), probe 1x100

III. MODELING OF THE TEST CIRCUIT

Computer simulations were performed on the model of test circuit containing elements drawn in Fig. 5. Overvoltages at busbars were calculated during disconnector closing operations, for the same substation layout on which measurements were carried out.

Fig. 5. Model of the test circuit Arc-4 Ω; stray-200 pF; connection tube Z=370 Ω; CVD-R=300 Ω, C=1 nF; VT-500 pF; CB-2 capacitors, each C≅2 nF, (capacitance of open contacts, each C≅20 pF), Ccb=100 pF; CT-500 pF; MOSA-100 pF; connection wire Z=440 Ω; PT-3.5 nF

Fig. 5. Model of the test circuit Arc-4 Ω; stray-200 pF; connection tube Z=370 Ω; CVD-R=300 Ω, C=1 nF; VT-500 pF; CB-2 capacitors, each C≅2 nF, (capacitance of open contacts, each C≅20 pF), Ccb=100 pF; CT-500 pF; MOSA-100 pF; connection wire Z=440 Ω; PT-3.5 nF

The waveshape of simulated overvoltage surge at load side is given in Fig. 6. The difference between magnitudes of measured and simulated overvoltages is 5 %. The dominant frequency of simulated overvoltage is 0.620 MHz. Comparison between results of measured and calculated overvoltages certified a good agreement of obtained values.

Fig. 6. Waveshape of simulated overvoltage surge

Fig. 6. Waveshape of simulated overvoltage surge

When the Capacitive Voltage Divider (CVD) was excluded, there were higher values of calculated overvoltages (15% higher on amplitude and 6 % on frequency). Capacitive divider due to primary resistor equal to 300 W and primary capacitance equal to 1 nF influences on overvoltage at the same measurement point causing attenuation and damping of transient overvoltrages. In order to reduce EMI in secondary circuits the best way is to reduce sources of interference emission during switching of air insulated disconnector.

One of the ways of reducing is to install disconnecting circuit breakers. Substation disconnectors isolate circuit breakers from rest of the system during maintenance and repair. The maintenance requirements for modern SF6 high voltage circuit breakers are lower than maintenance demands made on disconnectors, which means one of reasons for disconnectors removed. Installing disconnecting circuit breaker there are no needs for switching operation of disconnectors. With disconnecting circuit breakers it is still possible to isolate the line, but low maintenance requirements means it is no longer necessary to isolate the circuit breaker. The disconnecting breaker had to be designed to safety lock in the open position, and to meet all voltage withstanding capabilities and safety requirements of disconnectors.

Another way of reducing sources of interference emission is to install circuit breaker without parallel capacitors to contacts. This suggestion is based on analyses performed on three circuit models:

  1. Model of CB with two breaking chambers and paralel capacitors and VT on netvork side of CB;
  2. Model of CB with two breaking chambers and without paralel capacitors and VT on netvork side of CB
  3. Model of CB with two breaking chambers and without paralel capacitors and VT on generator side of CB

Magnitudes of simulated overvoltages are presented in Table I. Voltages are measured in point of connection of VT, CT and PT.

TABLE I - MAGNITUDES OF SIMULATED OVERVOLTAGES

TABLE I - MAGNITUDES OF SIMULATED OVERVOLTAGES

Overvoltages on generator side of 220 kV CB during switching of disconnectors could be up to 320 V in the case of installing instrument voltage transformer (VT) on generator side of CB without parallel capacitors (near instrument current transformer CT). This case causes installing of circuit breaker at generator’s voltage (10,5 kV) for synchronization of generator to network (better conditions for synchronization). This solution of installing circuit breakers on generator’s voltage resulted from problems have occurred during synchronization of generatror with current 220 kV CB.

IV. CONCLUSION

Switching overvoltages due to disconnector operations have been analysed on the existing 220 kV AIS on HPP Grabovica. Measurements and calculations were conducted on the characteristic points in AIS, in order to determine the level of the EMI.

The result of measurements has shown that high frequency voltages on busbars occur with amplitudes up to 1.16 p.u. (233 kVpeak) and the dominant frequencies up to 0.6 MHz. The difference between magnitudes of measured and calculated overvoltages is 5 % and 15.6 % on frequency. Measured common mode voltages at secondary circuits were from 430 V up to 708 V. CVD influences on overvoltages at the same measurement point on busbars causing attenuation and damping of transient overvoltages.

Comparison of the transient computer simulations with field measurements showed that calculations could be used for
assessment of the transient overvoltages due to disconnector switching. In order to reduce EMI in secondary circuits, it is suggested to install switching modules and disconnecting circuit breakers [10] or to install circuit breakers without parallel capacitors to contacts.

AUTHORS: Salih Carsimamovic, Zijad Bajramovic, Miroslav Ljevak, Meludin Veledar, Nijaz Halilhodzic

.

Related articles

Standard IEC 60947-2

Standard IEC 60947-2 | Circuit Breakers

This standard applies to circuit-breakers, the main contacts of which are intended to be connected to circuits, the rated voltage of which does not exceed 1000 VAC or 1500 VDC.; it also contains additional requirements for integrally fused circuit-breakers.

It applies whatever the rated currents, the method of construction or the proposed applications of the circuit-breakers may be.

Changes in dependability needs and technologies have led to a marked increase in standard requirements for industrial circuit-breakers.

Conformity with standard IEC 947-2, renamed IEC 60947-2 in 1997, can be considered as an ‘all-risk’ insurance for use of circuit-breakers. This standard has been approved by all countries.

The principles

Standard IEC 60947-2 is part of a series of standards defining the specifications for LV electrical switchgear:

  • the general rules IEC 60947-1, that group the definitions, specifications and tests common to all LV industrial switchgear.
  • the product standards IEC 60947-2 to 7, that deal with specifications and tests specific to the product concerned. Standard IEC 60947-2 applies to circuit-breakers and their associated trip units. Circuit-breaker operating data depend on the trip units or relays that control their opening in specific conditions.

This standard defines the main data of industrial circuit-breakers:

  • their classification: utilisation category, suitability for isolation, etc.
  • the electrical setting data
  • the information useful for operation
  • the design measures
  • coordination of protection devices

The standard also draws up series of conformity tests to be undergone by the circuitbreakers. These tests, which are very complete, are very close to real operating conditions. Conformity of these tests with standard IEC 60947-2 is verified by accredited laboratories.

Table of main data (appendix K IEC 60947-2):

Table of main data (appendix K IEC 60947-2)

Circuit-breaker category

Category IEC 60947-2 defines two circuit-breaker categories:

  • category A circuit-breakers, for which no tripping delay is provided. This is normally the case of moulded case circuit-breakers. These circuit-breakers can provide current discrimination.
  • category B circuit-breakers, for which, in order to provide time discrimination, tripping can be delayed (up to 1 s) for all short-circuits of value less than the current Icw.

This is normally the case of power or moulded case circuit-breakers with high ratings. For circuit-breakers installed in the MSBs, it is important to have an lcw equal to lcu in order to naturally provide discrimination up to full ultimate breaking capacity Icu.

Reminders of standard-related electrical data

The setting data are given by the tripping curves. These curves contain some areas limited by the following currents.

The setting data are given by the tripping curves.

  • Rated operational current (In)
    In (in A rms) = maximum uninterrupted current withstood at a given ambient temperature without abnormal temperature rise.
    E.g. 125 A at 40 °C
  • Adjustable overload setting current (lr)
    Ir (in A rms) is a function of ln. lr characterises overload protection. For operation in overload, the conventional non-tripping currents lnd and tripping currents ld are:

    • Ind = 1.05 Ir
    • Id = 1.30 Ir

    Id is given for a conventional tripping time. For a current greater than ld, tripping by thermal effect will take place according to an inverse time curve. Ir is known as Long Time Protection (LTP).

  • Short time tripping setting current (Isd)
    Isd
    (in kA rms) is a function of Ir. lsd characterises short-circuit protection. The circuit breaker opens according to the short time tripping curve:

    • either with a time delay tsd,
    • or with constant I2t,
    • or instantaneously (similar to instantaneous protection).

    Isd is known as Short Time Protection or lm.

  • Instantaneous tripping setting current (Ii)
    Ii (in kA) is given as a function of ln. It characterises the instantaneous short-circuit protection for all circuit-breaker categories. For high overcurrents (short-circuits) greater than the li threshold, the circuit-breaker must immediately break the fault current.
    .
    This protection device can be disabled according to the technology and type of circuit-breaker (particularly B category circuit-breakers).

Rated short time withstand current

Table for calculation of asymmetrical short-circuits (IEC 60947.2 para. 4.3.5.3.)

Table for calculation of asymmetrical short-circuits

  • Rated short-circuit making capacity(*) (Icm)
    Icm (peak kA) is the maximum value of the asymmetrical short-circuit current that the circuit-breaker can make and break. For a circuit-breaker, the stress to be managed is greatest on closing on a short-circuit.
  • Rated ultimate breaking capacity(*) (Icu)
    Icu (kA rms) is the maximum short-circuit current value that the circuit-breaker can break. It is verified according to a sequence of standardised tests. After this sequence, the circuit-breaker must not be dangerous. This characteristic is defined for a specific voltage rating Ue.
  • Rated service breaking capacity(*) (Ics)
    Ics (kA rms) is given by the manufacturer and is expressed as a % of Icu. This performance is very important as it gives the ability of a circuit-breaker to provide totally normal operation once it has broken this short-circuit current three times. The higher Ics, the more effective the circuit-breaker.
  • Rated short time withstand current(*) (Icw)
    Defined for B category circuit-breakers
    Icw (kA rms) is the maximum short-circuit current that the circuit-breaker can withstand for a short period of time (0.05 to 1 s) without its properties being affected. This performance is verified during the standardised test sequence.
    .
    (*) These data are defined for a specific voltage rating Ue.
Circuit-breaker coordination

The term coordination concerns the behaviour of two devices placed in series in electrical power distribution in the presence of a short-circuit.

Cascading and discrimination

  • Cascading or back-up protection
    This consists of installing an upstream circuit-breaker D1 to help a downstream circuit-breaker D2 to break short-circuit currents greater than its ultimate breaking capacity IcuD2. This value is marked IcuD2+D1.
    IEC 60947-2 recognises cascading between two circuit-breakers. For critical points, where tripping curves overlap, cascading must be verified by tests.
  • Discrimination
    This consists of providing coordination between the operating characteristics of circuit-breakers placed in series so that should a downstream fault occur, only the circuit-breaker placed immediately upstream of the fault will trip.
    IEC 60947-2 defines a current value ls known as the discrimination limit such that:

    • if the fault current is less than this value ls, only the downstream circuit-breaker D2 trips,
    • if the fault current is greater than this value ls, both circuit-breakers D1 and D2 trip.

    Just as for cascading, discrimination must be verified by tests for critical points.

Discrimination and cascading can only be guaranteed by the manufacturer who will record his tests in tables.

IEC 60947-2 Summary

Standard IEC 60947.2 specifies the main data of Industrial Circuit-Breakers:

  • the utilisation category
  • the setting data
  • the design measures
  • etc.

It draws up a series of very complete tests representative of circuit-breaker real operating conditions.

SOURCE: Schneider Electric

.

Related articles

Maintenance Of Molded Case Circuit Breakers (MCCB)

Maintenance Of Molded Case Circuit Breakers (MCCB)

The maintenance of circuit breakers deserves special consideration because of their importance for routine switching and for protection of other equipment.

Electric transmission system breakups and equip­ment destruction can occur if a circuit breaker fails to operate because of a lack of preventive maintenance.

The need for maintenance of circuit breakers is often not obvious as circuit breakers may remain idle, either open or closed, for long periods of time. Breakers that remain idle for 6 months or more should be made to open and close several times in succession to verify proper operation and remove any accumulation of dust or foreign material on moving parts and contacts.

Frequency Of Maintenance

Molded case circuit breakers are designed to require little or no routine maintenance throughout their normal life­ time. Therefore, the need for preventive maintenance will vary depending on operating conditions. As an accumulation of dust on the latch surfaces may affect the operation of the breaker, molded case circuit breakers should be exercised at least once per year.

Routine trip testing should be performed every 3 to 5 years.

Routine Maintenance Tests

Routine maintenance tests enable personnel to determine if breakers are able to perform their basic circuit protective functions. The following tests may be performed during routine maintenance and are aimed at assuring that the breakers are functionally operable. The following tests are to be made only on breakers and equipment that are deenergized.

Insulation Resistance Test

A megohmmeter may be used to make tests between phases of opposite polarity and from current-carrying parts of the circuit breaker to ground. A test should also be made between the line and load terminals with the breaker in the open position. Load and line conductors should be dis­ connected from the breaker under insulation resistance tests to prevent test mesurements from also showing resistance of the attached circuit.

Resistance values below 1 megohm are considered unsafe and the breaker should be inspected for pos­ sible contamination on its surfaces.

Milivolt Drop Test

A millivolt drop test can disclose several abnor­ mal conditions inside a breaker such as eroded contacts, contaminated contacts, or loose internal connec­ tions. The millivolt drop test should be made at a nominal direct-current volt­ age at 50 amperes or 100 amperes for large breakers, and at or below rating for smaller breakers. The millivolt drop is compared against manufacturer’s data for the breaker being tested.

Connections Test

The connections to the circuit breaker should be inspected to determine that a good joint is present and that overheating is not occurring. If overheating is indi­ cated by discoloration or signs of arcing, the connections should be re­ moved and the connecting surfaces cleaned.

Overload tripping test

The proper action of the overload tripping components of the circuit breaker can be verified by applying 300 percent of the breaker rated continuous current to each pole. The significant part of this test is the automatic opening of the circuit breaker and not tripping times as these can be greatly affected by ambient conditions and test condi­ tions.

Mechanical operation

The mechanical operation of the breaker should be checked by turning the breaker on and off several times.

SOURCE: HYDROELECTRIC RESEARCH AND TECHNICAL SERVICES GROUP

.

Related articles

ANSI CODE : 50BF Circuit Breaker Failure

ANSI CODE : 50BF Circuit Breaker Failure

This function is designed to detect the failure of breakers that do not open when a tripping order is sent. The “breaker failure” protection function is activated by an O1 output tripping order received from the overcurrent protection functions (50/51, 50N/51N, 46, 67N, 67). It checks for the disappearance of current during the time interval specified by the time delay T.

It may also take into account the position of the circuit breaker read on the logic inputs to determine the actual opening of the breaker. Wiring a volt-free closed circuit breaker position contact on the “breaker closed” equation editor input can ensure that the protection is effective in the following situations:

  • When 50BF is activated by protection function 50N/51N (set point Is0 < 0.2 In), detection of the 50BF current set point can possibly be not operational.
  • When trip circuit supervision (TCS) is used, the closed circuit breaker contact is short-circuited. Logic input I102 is therefore no longer operational.

Automatic activation of this protection function requires the use of the program logic circuit breaker control function. A specific input may also be used to activate the protection from the equation editor. That option is useful for adding special cases of activation (e.g. tripping by an external protection unit).
The time-delayed output of the protection unit should be assigned to a logic output via the control matrix.
The starting and stopping of the time delay T counter are conditioned by the presence of a current above the set point (I > Is).

Block diagram
Block diagram – 50BF

Block diagram – 50BF

Example of setting

The example below shows how to determine the time delay setting for the 50BF function Overcurrent protection setting: T = inst. Circuit breaker operating time: 60 ms.
Auxiliary relay operating time to open the upstream breaker or breakers: 10 ms.a

Example of setting

Example of setting using SEPAM relay

The time delay for the 50BF function is the sum of the following times: Sepam O1 output relay pick-up time = 10 ms Circuit breaker opening time = 60 ms Overshoot time for the breaker failure function = 20 ms.

To avoid unwanted tripping of the upstream breakers, choose a margin of approximately 20 ms. This gives us a time delay T = 110 ms.

.

Related articles